HH
Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered strong top-line growth with revenue up 30% YoY to $110.3M, driven by a 91% YoY surge in Insurance-as-a-Service (IaaS) and higher premium retention; however, catastrophic losses from the Los Angeles wildfires masked underlying profitability improvements .
- Consolidated gross loss ratio rose to 95% and net loss ratio to 106% in Q1 (vs. 59% and 87% in Q1 2024), largely due to LA wildfire impacts of ~$45M; HHIP gross loss ratio reached 121% (56pp attributable to LA fires) while non-PCS improved to 53% YoY, evidencing portfolio remediation .
- Management reiterated 2025 targets: revenue $465–$475M, adjusted EBITDA loss $(35)–$(39)M, full-year net loss $(65)–$(69)M, and net income profitability in Q4 2025; Investor Day scheduled for June 12, 2025 and $50M surplus note signed to support Spinnaker growth (approx. 9.5% rate) pending regulatory approval .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, Q1 revenue beat ($110.3M vs. $106.7M*) while EPS missed (−$1.91 vs. −$1.405*), with the EPS shortfall primarily tied to wildfire losses and FAIR Plan assessments (some recoupment expected later) .
- Operating leverage improved materially: fixed expenses (S&M, T&D, G&A) fell $7M YoY as revenue rose $25M, reducing fixed costs to 30% of revenue (from 48% in Q1 2024), a trend management expects to persist with automation and infrastructure investments .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Premium growth and mix: Revenue +30% YoY to $110.3M; IaaS revenue +91% YoY to $39M driven by higher gross earned premium and retention; HHIP revenue +12% YoY on improved reinsurance structure lifting net earned premium to 85% of gross earned premium .
- Portfolio quality: HHIP non-PCS loss ratio improved 6pp YoY to 53% due to pricing, coverage changes, and underwriting actions implemented in 2024; new homes channel was resilient and unaffected by LA fires .
- Operating efficiency: Fixed expenses (S&M, T&D, G&A) declined $7M YoY and fell to 30% of revenue, demonstrating improving scalability; management highlighted continued investments in automation to sustain leverage .
What Went Wrong
- Catastrophe impact: LA wildfires drove a $45M expense, pushing consolidated net loss ratio to 106% and HHIP gross loss ratio to 121%; adjusted EBITDA loss widened to $(41.1)M (wildfires contributed $45M) .
- Net loss widened: Net loss attributable to Hippo increased $12M YoY to $(47.7)M, though management emphasized underlying improvement excluding wildfires (+$33M YoY) .
- Elevated PCS losses: Consolidated PCS losses surged (gross: 54% of GLR; net: 61% of NLR), indicating outsized catastrophe drag despite attritional improvements .
Financial Results
Revenue, EPS, and Margins — Prior Periods and Estimates
Note: Starred values (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Actual vs Consensus – Q1 2025
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Revenue Breakdown
KPIs and Profitability
HHIP Loss Ratio Detail (Q1 2025)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We proactively supported customers [after LA wildfires] and further advanced the key drivers of long-term value… New homes… were not impacted by the fires” .
- CFO: “Revenue grew 30% YoY to $110 million… IaaS revenue grew 91% YoY… HHIP revenue grew 12% YoY… [and] net earned premium as % of gross earned premium to 85%” .
- Strategy: “Signed an agreement to raise a $50 million surplus note… to support growth… without diluting our consolidated equity base” .
- Profitability path: “We remain on track to generate net profit by the end of the year… annual run-rate by Q4’25 of >$500M revenue” .
Q&A Highlights
- Surplus note economics: Approx. 9.5% rate; proceeds to fund Spinnaker risk participation and maintain AM Best rating; supports HHIP growth without equity dilution .
- FAIR Plan assessment: Included in the $45M wildfire impact; company expects future recoupment from policyholders (not recorded yet) .
- EBITDA/Net income trajectory: Adjusted EBITDA profitability expected in Q4’25; excluding LA wildfires, FY’25 would have been adjusted EBITDA positive per management .
- Tariffs/material inflation: Coverage A and premiums adjust automatically at renewal; technology enables timely adjustments without regulatory delays .
- Reinsurance protection: Hippo’s program losses “barely” entered first XOL layer; corporate cat across HHIP and Spinnaker programs deemed ample .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 actuals vs consensus: Revenue beat (110.3M vs 106.7M*), EPS miss (−1.91 vs −1.405*); # of estimates limited (Revenue: 3, EPS: 2), which can amplify realized variance. EPS miss driven by LA wildfire costs including FAIR Plan assessments (recoupment expected later) .
- Implications: Street models likely adjust for seasonal PCS loads (peak in Q2), improved non-PCS loss ratios, and operating leverage; FY’25 guidance ranges provide explicit anchors for revenue and profitability cadence .
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Top-line momentum intact with revenue +30% YoY and IaaS +91% YoY; mix shift and higher retention are durable drivers into 2H’25 .
- Cat losses were transitory and concentrated in legacy HHIP; non-PCS loss ratio improvements validate underwriting actions and portfolio pruning .
- Capital plan supports growth: $50M surplus note (~9.5% rate) enhances Spinnaker participation in high-quality programs without equity dilution; a catalyst for diversification and ROE leverage .
- Guidance credible and granular: FY’25 revenue $465–$475M, Q4’25 net income positive, with explicit PCS seasonality assumptions and fixed cost discipline; watch Q2 PCS peak and trajectory into Q3/Q4 .
- Operating leverage trend is a differentiator: fixed costs as % of revenue down to 30%; ongoing automation suggests further scale benefits .
- Near-term trading: Expect sensitivity to catastrophe headlines (Q2 PCS peak) and regulatory approval of surplus note; Investor Day (June 12) is a narrative catalyst on long-term targets .
- Medium-term thesis: Diversification via Spinnaker hybrid fronting and New Homes channel resilience underpin loss ratio normalization and path to sustained profitability; estimate revisions likely reflect improving non-PCS trends and maintained cost discipline .